A Quarter in Advance
Breguet’s one-hand pocket watch simplified the machinery and changed how customers paid for it. A large dial, a repairable movement and a quarter of the price in advance formed the bargain.
What's the deal?
Good watches were expensive. In the 1790s, Breguet offered a simpler one-hand watch at a lower price, with customers paying a quarter in advance to help finance its manufacture. He also designed it to be easier to inspect and repair. The offer joined a practical engineering choice to a business arrangement intended to bring quality watchmaking to more buyers.
On 24 August 1805, Frédéric Frackmann bought two watches from Breguet. One was a repeating watch, capable of sounding the time. The other had a single hand. This second purchase was hardly austere: its case and dial were gold, and its back carried a pattern of concentric circles. A product devised to bring good watchmaking within reach of more customers could still leave the workshop dressed for an expensive buyer.
It was a montre de souscription, a subscription watch. Abraham-Louis Breguet had offered the type in the 1790s from his workshop on the Quai de l’Horloge in Paris. Its name described a way to finance production. The customer paid part of the price before the watch was ready; the maker used a simpler construction to offer a lower price.
The missing minute hand was the most visible economy. Breguet also promised a movement that a watchmaker could inspect without taking everything apart, and repairs that could be carried out in any country.
Before the watch was finished
Breguet returned to Paris in the spring of 1795 after spending two difficult years in Switzerland during the French Revolution. He was a watchmaker with an established reputation and a business to rebuild. His premises stood on the Île de la Cité, the island in the Seine at the centre of Paris.
The subscription watch began to appear in sales in 1796. In 1797, Breguet printed a prospectus explaining the offer. He began with a complaint: astronomical and marine timekeepers had reached a high standard, while ordinary watches were often poor and the best ones cost more than most citizens could pay. He proposed something between those extremes, intended for everyday use.
To make it properly, he needed to manufacture a number of watches together. That required capital. Borrowing, he complained, meant paying interest so high that no honest industry could cover it. Customers could supply part of the money instead, receiving a more moderate purchase price in return.
The advertised deposit was 150 livres.
That was one quarter of the quoted 600-livre price. Breguet promised to deliver in subscription order, within a period fixed by the receipt. A prospective owner was committing money to an unfinished watch, while the workshop gained funds before completing the work. The rest was payable on completion.
The 600-livre offer specified a silver case with gold borders. Richer versions cost more. Frackmann’s gold watch was one such variation. Its case was made by Joly, a name also found behind other Breguet watches. On a surviving souscription in the Louvre, Jean-Louis Joly’s mark consists of the initials JLJ in a diamond topped by a bird. The Breguet signature on the dial belonged to work that passed through several specialists’ hands.
Five minutes between the marks
A single hand could give a more useful reading than its bare description suggests. The large enamel dial carried twelve divisions between each pair of hour numerals. The hand crossed one division every five minutes. Two marks beyond three meant ten past three; a position between adjacent marks allowed a closer estimate.
Breguet claimed that the spacing made it possible to judge the time to about a minute. This was a claim about reading the dial. It did not specify how many seconds or minutes the watch might gain or lose over a day.
The simplification continued inside. A large central barrel held the mainspring that powered the watch, with the wheels arranged around it. The single hand was driven from this central assembly, avoiding the usual additional gearing needed for separate hour and minute hands. Separate bridges supported the wheels while leaving much of the mechanism open to inspection.
On watch No. 1836, examined by The Naked Watchmaker, the owner could open the front and move the hand directly. Setting in one direction also wound the spring; a key at the back finished the winding.
A double stop-work limited winding and running down, restricting the spring to a steadier part of its force. The prospectus offered a running duration of 36 hours.
Under the single-hand dial
The Naked Watchmaker’s film accompanies its study of No. 1836, moving from the dial to the working mechanism. It is a different watch from the 1821 example illustrated here.
The Naked WatchmakerWatch on YouTube ↗Simplicity with a ruby cylinder
Breguet retained devices that addressed the small failures capable of spoiling a watch. A cylinder escapement controls the release of power to the oscillating balance. Ordinary versions had friction and wear to contend with; his use of ruby for the cylinder reduced friction at the contact with the escape wheel. Temperature compensation addressed changes in the steel balance spring. A shock-protecting suspension, the pare-chute, protected the vulnerable balance pivot on mature examples.
These provisions could coexist with a modest display. A souscription made in 1816 and now in Florence’s Museo Galileo has the ruby-cylinder escapement and shock protection, with separate bridges and a rotating barrel. Individual watches retained differences; the family name did not identify one unchanging movement fitted to every case.
The examination of No. 1836 found wear elsewhere in the train but little on the ruby cylinder and the contacting escape-wheel surfaces. Its earlier servicing and replacement parts cannot be reconstructed from those surfaces alone.
A name difficult to copy
Making a good watch more recognisable also mattered to the business. In his prospectus, Breguet complained of watches sold under his name in which he had played no part. He proposed a special machine-made mark on the dial, difficult enough to imitate that counterfeiting it should cost more than it would earn.
The secret signature was faintly cut into the enamel. A pantograph guided the marking point, transferring a pattern at a reduced scale. It added little to the watch’s outward display but gave the maker another means of distinguishing his work from copies. The ordinary signature, the case-maker’s punch and the small secret inscription each recorded a different part of the watch’s identity.
The souscription watch remained in production beyond the immediate rebuilding of Breguet’s business. On 21 June 1821, Mr Demidoff bought the silver-cased watch illustrated here, with gold borders and a single steel hand. The recorded price was 630 francs. A quarter-century after the type first appeared, an owner could still open the case on either side and wind it at the centre.
Further reading
- David Lionel Salomons, Breguet (1747–1823), 1921: the prospectus, object descriptions and photographs
- Emmanuel Breguet, À l’origine de la famille « Tradition »
- Breguet, Sale of the first subscription watch
- Christie’s, souscription watch No. 1602, sold to Frédéric Frackmann in 1805
- Musée du Louvre, souscription watch No. 1391 by Breguet and Jean-Louis Joly
- The Naked Watchmaker, deconstruction of Breguet souscription watch No. 1836
- Museo Galileo, souscription-type watch of 1816
